data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2aa6/e2aa60f17f7a8c0d1b729ef8ffbca7c5d9ae75c1" alt=""
Sunday, June 28, 2009
Traveling to Tennessee over the 4th of July
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2aa6/e2aa60f17f7a8c0d1b729ef8ffbca7c5d9ae75c1" alt=""
Saturday, June 27, 2009
U.S. House narrowly passes major energy-climate bill
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44a35/44a35dfb8c0d72202c1cb0c6d8e866caeaf7369e" alt=""
The vote was 219-212, capping months of negotiations and days of intense bargaining among Democrats. Republicans were overwhelmingly against the measure, arguing it would destroy jobs in the midst of a recession while burdening consumers with a new tax in the form of higher energy costs."
As can be seen from the closeness of the vote, a significant number of democrat congress members were against this sweeping bill. One of those was democrat Charlie Melancon from Louisiana. Charlie was formerly top dog at the American Sugar Cane League, holding the position that Jim Simon now holds. Charlie represents south Louisiana whose economy is heavily dependent on the success of the oil and gas industry, so he was obligated to come out against the bill. Charlie had to have had some mixed emotions about this, in that the sugar industry would benefit by legislation that promotes green energy, and the fact that there is no other area in the U.S. more severely impacted by global warming than southern Louisiana.
I will admit that I have mixed emotions as well. We are surely moving into a brave new world with the passing of this legislation. Here is a useful Q&A website relative to this bill.
With this legislation, we are almost certainly going to hear more in the news about "cap and trade," so it is probably going to be useful to become more familiar with what this term means.
Thursday, June 25, 2009
LSU Tigers...College World Series Champions!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9aed1/9aed18bca6acfa66d6a62e6ca3fa0aea372cd0d5" alt=""
Friday, June 19, 2009
Vegetable Field Day at our USDA research facility
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e6470/e6470753edf5c1615b629b98d5d7d9758326db0b" alt=""
While on the subject of crops, people outside of Louisiana may not be aware that we are going through a fairly severe drought, with no relief in sight. If the drought keeps up for another two weeks, it will have a severe impact on Lousiana agriculture generally. Farmers are very concerned.
Wednesday, June 17, 2009
New addition at our house
He needs a name. So you are welcome to weigh in, after looking at his picture. The dog has a black back, and his belly and legs are solid brown. The thing I like most about this dog, especially compared to Nikki, is that this dog is very quiet. As a watch dog, I guess this isn't a good thing, but for peace in the house, it is great.
Sunday, June 14, 2009
Religious life in the South
Our Tennessee "Friends of Sewanee" shared a rather humorous Ray Stevens video about religious life in the South, entitled "The Mississippi Squirrel Revival." Ray mentions Pascagoula, Mississippi in the video, which is not too far from Louisiana and a place some people around here can relate to. Hope you enjoy the video as much as I did. Thanks to our Friends for sharing it.
Tuesday, June 2, 2009
Verdict on crop-based ethanol
Chief among ethanol detractors are David Pimentel and Tad Patzek. One question I am sure has been frequently posed to them whenever they have argued against ethanol production from a crop, is this. "What about Brazil? You say it can't be done, yet Brazil is successfully doing it on a grand scale!" Pimentel and Patzek have taken the 8:1 output/input claim head on, presumably with the expectation that if they can debunk the 8:1 output/input claim, they can pretty much take the wind out of the the sails of any argument for biofuels. They recently published a paper basically aimed at raising doubts about the Brazilian sugarcane output/input ratio. Based on their own calculations, they reported the output/input ratio for sugarcane-based ethanol industry in Brazil to be no better than 1.38:1, claiming that important energy inputs were not accounted for, to get the 8:1 ratio. Most of the unaccounted for energy costs that Pimentel and Patzek allude to are associated with the factory component, rather than the field component. Using their numbers, it wouldn't matter what the yields are in the field; you couldn't improve much on their ratio even if the cane and sugar yields were triple or quadruple what they are today. Personally, I think their numbers in the factory component need a closer inspection. From the massive amount of fibrous residue (bagasse) produced when sugar is extracted from sugarcane, mills around the world today provide all of their own power and feed excess power into the electric grid of the surrounding community, and in some cases, a lot of excess power into the electric grid. There are huge differences in boiler efficiencies. It makes a huge difference if the factory energy input numbers were meant for production of crystallized sugar rather than production of ethanol. So I am skeptical of the Pimentel and Patzek numbers, especially knowing that they have an agenda to begin with. I don't believe they adequately account for the energy output potential of baggase in their calculations.
The 8:1 ratio may be inflated, but 1.38:1 when factories are net exporters of energy before the energy from ethanol is even factored in...you've got to be kidding!
We had a field day on Friday. I was asked to discuss some of the energy crop activity we are involved in. We highlighted sugarcane, energy cane (behind me in the photo), sugarbeets, sweet sorghum, and tropical maize (non-flowering tropical maize in my right hand; a so-called sugarcorn hybrid from Illinois in my left hand). The corn I was holding for demonstration purposes was planted only 60 days ago (April 8). Needless to say, the topic stimulated a lot of interest and questions. When I passed the tropical maize plant around, people couldn't believe how heavy it was. It will be interesting to see how tall our tropical maize gets before it finally decides to flower. Right now, it is about 8 feet tall. Believe it or not, it was only 18 inches tall 30 days ago.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)