data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ca9b7/ca9b7bff034052ed0e47c6ac0131d95b82345907" alt=""
In the January 20, 2009 post of Robert Rapier's
R-Squared Energy Blog (one of my energy-blog favorites), Rapier makes a compelling case that ethanol-fueled engines need to be designed to exploit the much higher octane rating, thus greater efficiency of ethanol over gasoline. With its higher octane rating, ethanol does not easily pre-ignite. Thus, if an engine were designed with a much higher compression ratio to exploit this advantage, it is conceivable that cars could actually go further on a gallon of ethanol than on a gallon of gasoline, even though ethanol only has 2/3 the BTU's per gallon that gasoline has. This is an interesting observation from Rapier who has to remind people from time to time that he really isn't anti-ethanol in spite of some earlier posts. This particular post is well worth reading, as is Rapier's entire blogsite.
The above picture is of a high-compression ethanol/biodiesel engine built by Swedish automaker Scania.
No comments:
Post a Comment